advertisement
Show Me Tort Reform: the Missouri Experience
The changes in one state and their implications for the nation.
In 2003, medicine in Missouri was on life support. Physicians were leaving in droves to practice in states with affordable malpractice insurance and a less predatory tort bar. Despite seven medical schools in Missouri and Kansas City, Kansas, few residents and fellows could afford to set up a practice in Missouri or to join state medical groups. Huge areas of the Show-Me State were left without neurosurgical or high-risk obstetrics coverage. This article reviews the enactment and effect of tort reform in Missouri and our related thoughts on health care reform at the national level.
KANSAS VERSUS MISSOURI
Many Missouri physicians headed west to Kansas in
2003. The contrast between the states is worth noting.
Kansas politics are dominated by commercial and agricultural
interests, and legislation is generally business
friendly. The Kansas Trial Lawyers Association, the executive
director/lobbyist of which from 1977 to 1986 was
current Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen
Sebelius, does not have nearly the power or influence of
its Missouri counterpart. The Sunflower State has created
a stabilization fund that provides reinsurance against
large adverse judgments. Consequently, Kansas physicians
had malpractice premiums as much as 30% to
50% lower than their colleagues in Missouri (Discover
Vision Centers, unpublished data).
Missouri trial lawyers are one of the major forces in the state’s politics. They dominate the Democratic Party and, in areas, hold sway with the Republican Party as well. Their fundraising for politicians is legendary and prodigious. Inner-city juries in St. Louis and Kansas City are much more sympathetic to plaintiff ’s cases than out-of-state juries.11 The US Chamber of Commerce declared 2003 Missouri one of the most hostile states in which to conduct business.2
ACTION
In full crisis mode, Missouri physicians mobilized as
never before for the 2004 state elections. Previously
somewhat parsimonious with their time and money,
physicians became major contributors to the campaigns
of Republican gubernatorial candidate Matt Blunt and
numerous candidates for the State Senate and House, all
of whom included in their platforms the enactment of
tort reform. Physicians handed out campaign materials in
their offices, let their patients know how runaway junk
lawsuits imperiled their care, and identified which candidates
were pledged to tort reform. Doctors advertised the cause on radio and television and in newspapers.
Ophthalmologists were especially engaged in the effort;
our practice, Discover Vision Centers, donated more
money than any other state physician group. The election
handed Governor Blunt a victory and ushered in
Senate and House majorities committed to changing the
status quo.
In 2005, physicians’ political activism contributed to the passage of House Bill 393, a sweeping tort reform law. A $350,000 cap was set on non-economic damages, change of venue was abolished, and numerous other provisions had an immediate effect on Missouri’s malpractice rates.2 The exodus of physicians slowed. Our practice’s malpractice premiums per Missouri ophthalmologist dropped from $22,718 in 2006 to $16,406 in 2009—a 28% reduction. (In 2009, however, the premiums for our Kansas-based ophthalmologists were only $8,937.) New physicians and new insurance carriers opened for business in Missouri. The number of malpractice lawsuits filed and judgments paid in the state plummeted to a 30-year low; the average payout is now about $50,000 below that of 2005.2
Not surprisingly, Missouri’s trial lawyers have mounted an effort to overturn tort reform by the judicial process, as executed successfully in Wisconsin.3 Their test case, carefully researched and lavishly financed, Klotz v St. Anthony’s, is presently before the Missouri Supreme Court.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NATIONAL REFORM
The unprecedented scope and speed of health care
legislation at the national level is putatively driven by the
costs and unavailability of medical care. The Manhattan
Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, in addition to physicians
and other thoughtful parties recognize that both
the measurable cost of malpractice litigation and the
much larger (but more difficult to compute) costs of
defensive medicine are significant expenditures. Ultimately,
the price of defensive medicine and unrestrained
tort litigation will be paid by unsustainable inflationary
monetary policies and confiscatory taxes on US citizens
and businesses.4
We believe that the flagrant omission of tort reform in the health care bills before Congress at the time of this writing can be explained by the fact that the American Association of Justice (the refurbished name of the American Trial Lawyers Association) and wealthy individual trial lawyers are top political donors to the Democratic Party.5
Physicians should start raising opposition to health care bills that do not contain tort reform or that they find otherwise pernicious. The 2010 elections are important. Physicians should discuss the issues and candidates with their patients, who, in our experience, are mostly sympathetic and respect doctors’ judgment. Physicians can distribute information in their office. Those in states with a US Senate race should find the best candidate and assist his or her campaign. Our practice has made a major commitment to US Representative Roy Blunt in his bid for a Senate seat.
We suggest meeting with state and national candidates, educating them, and—if they agree with tort reform—supporting them early in their campaigns. Based on the Missouri experience, we believe that motivated medical professionals can help shape positive health care legislation and enact tort reform.
Jim Denning is the CEO of Discover Vision Centers in Kansas City, Missouri. Mr. Denning may be reached at (818) 350-4529; jdenning@discovervision.com.
John F. Doane, MD, is in private practice with Discover Vision Centers in Kansas City, Missouri, and he is a clinical assistant professor with the Department of Ophthalmology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. Dr. Doane may be reached at (816) 478-1230; jdoane@discovervision.com.
John C. Hagan III, MD, is the editor of Missouri Medicine: the Medical Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association. He practices ophthalmology at Discover Vision Centers in Kansas City, Missouri. Dr. Hagan may be reached at (816) 478-1230; jhagan@bizkc.rr.com.
advertisement
TOP 5 ARTICLES FROM 2010
- Corneal Protection In Cataract Surgery
Safeguarding the cornea against disease elements and environmental challenges.
- Feature Story: OVDs in Challenging Surgeries
Two surgeons share challenging cataract cases with outcomes that were improved by strategies using ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.
by Garry P. Condon, MD and Michael E. Snyder, MD
- IOLs: How to Succeed With the AcrySof IQ Restor Lens
Six steps for excellent outcomes after cataract surgery with this multifocal IOL.
by Thomas G. Adell, MD
- The Consequences of Not Offering Premium Lenses
It’s all relative.
by John F. Doane, MD, and James A. Denning
- Presbyopia- Correcting IOLs
by Malaika David, Associate Editor
Sides Media